The
Wayne Thiebaud and Allan Stone Interview

The
San Francisco Art Dealers Association in collaboration
with City Arts & Lectures presented The Artists
in Conversation Series on January 10, 2002 at The
Four Seasons Hotel. Wayne Thiebaud and Allan Stone
were interviewed by Jeremy Stone. The event was
a fundraiser for the 1st Annual SFADA Art Grant
which will benefit nonprofit arts spaces and organizations
in San Francisco.
Wayne Thiebaud and Allan Stone 01/10/02, City Arts
and Lectures and the San Francisco Art Dealers
Association, 2002 Artists in Conversation Lecture
Series, at The Four Seasons Hotel, San Francisco,
CA.
Good evening. On behalf of the San Francisco
Art Dealers Association, the Four Seasons Hotel,
and City Arts and Lectures, it's my pleasure
to welcome you to our inaugural event of what
we anticipate to be the first of many such cooperative
events celebrating artists while we're raising
funds for San Francisco's many worthy nonprofit
organizations and worthy artists in need. My
name is Cheryl Wicker, and I'm the president
of the Art Dealers Association. As many of you
know, the San Francisco Art Dealers Association,
also known as SFADA, is composed of 32 member
galleries from the Bay Area. Our association
was founded in 1972 for the purpose of increasing
awareness of the arts in our community. SFADA
sponsors such events as First Thursdays, Introductions,
which presents first time exhibitions for emerging
artists, and forum discussions supporting the
international art fair as well as lectures and
gifts to Bay Area artists, art schools, and museums.
To open our Artists in Conversation series, we're
especially fortunate to have the beloved and
internally recognized Wayne Thiebaud and long
time respected art dealer, Allan Stone.
[A. Stone] Not beloved? [laughter]
[Wicker] You're beloved now. And Jeremy Stone,
founder of Business Matters in the Visual Arts.
Jeremy advises individuals and organizations
on the professional practices of the art world.
She's also one of Allan's six daughters, three
of whom are here tonight. And Jeremy will interview
these two old friends about their very unique
relationship.
Before we start, I'd like to thank Stan Bromley
of the Four Seasons Hotel for his generosity
in helping us launch this series, Sydney Goldstein
of City Arts and Lectures [applause], and our
hard working committee, Paule Anglim, Ruth Braunstein,
Karen Jenkins Johnson, George Krevsky, Alex Meyerovich,
and Marcel Sitcoske And now please join me in
welcoming Wayne Thiebaud, Allan Stone, and Jeremy
Stone. [applause]
[J. Stone] I want to thank Ruth Braunstein and
Cheryl Wicker for giving me the unique opportunity
to-and pleasure to introduce two of the most
fascinating and charismatic men in the art world.
[laughter]
[A. Stone] That's more like it. [laughter]
[J. Stone] Wayne Thiebaud is famous not only
for his luscious and seductive paintings, drawings,
and prints, but also as a dedicated and inspiring
teacher. A professor emeritus of art at UC Davis,
that he continues to teach, even though he is
supposed to be retired speaks about his process.
His grandfather, Rudolph, was a superintendent
of schools in Indiana. Education is in his blood.
Wayne's real first name is Morton after his father
who was an inventor and engineer. Wayne first
took up drawing while recuperating from a major
sports injury during high school. He broke his
back. Wayne continues to push and take risks
in his work on a daily basis. He is not content
to rest on his laurels. He is
a philosopher, a joke teller, a diplomat, and
one of the kindest men to walk the planet.
He is the ambassador of color, and Wayne is
a great tennis player. Allan Stone was an attorney
briefly before he founded his gallery in New
York City 41 years ago. [laughter] Don't worry.
Allan is not just a dealer, but an avid collector
beyond your wildest nightmare. [laughter] A
passionate gardener, environmentalist, film
lover, practices medicine without a license,
advises on alternative treatment for cancer,
and Allan is a great tennis player.
[Thiebaud] A greater tennis player! [laughter]
[J. Stone] Wayne Thiebaud and Allan Stone are
superficially quite different. One is an artist
dedicated to the art of making the work. The
other a dealer, immersed in the process of building
collections, curating, and selling work. Forty
years ago, these men met and forged a connection,
a relationship which continues to this day. I
have a few questions for the two of you for everyone.
There are many misperceptions and stereotypes
about artists, dealers, and their galleries.
However, the two of you have shared a very unique,
mutually supportive relationship for-I'm going
to say it again-40 years. Longer than most marriages
today. [laughter]
[Thiebaud] Watch out, you're going to jinx us!
[laughter]
[J. Stone] I have observed much respect and affection
between the two of you.
Wayne, could you explain the chemistry that has
made your relationship work?
[Thiebaud] I flunked chemistry. [laughter] Chemistry.
[J. Stone] Allan? [laughter]
[A. Stone] I think the secret of our relationship
is that we 1) never talk much about art. We don't
talk much about business. We talk about eating
and tennis most of the time. [laughter] We have
a community of interest. [laughter]
[J. Stone] You've answered my next question.
Culturally, you couldn't be from more different
backgrounds. Wayne, you were raised by conservative,
religious Mormon parents. Allan, you were raised
in New York by Baroque Jewish parents [laughter]
during fairly anti-Semitic times.
[A. Stone] Bizarre would be a better word. [laughter]
[J. Stone] What is the common ground that you've
discovered over the years between the two of
you besides food and tennis? Either of you?.
[A. Stone] Well, basically, I became an art
junkie very early in my life. My father was a
lawyer who represented Vladimir Horowitz, the
concert pianist. He represented the Three Stooges
until they walked through a plate glass door
in his office. And he represented a cartoonist
by the name of Gus Edson who did a strip called "The
Gumps." And Gus Edson used to visit us when
we lived in Stanford. And he was showing me how
to draw and how to do cartooning. And I for some
reason found that really fascinating. And he
said, "Look, kid, if you want to really
take the high road, copy Prince Valiant, because
that's the best art." You know? And I started-I
mean, that's how I started out. My interest in
art started way back then. And it just never
abated. It was always-I would always go see art.
And then I went away to prep school. I was lucky
enough to go to Andover where they had the Addison
Museum. They had wonderful works by Bellows.
They had great Winslow Homers. And I'll never
forget, they had a traveling exhibition sponsored
by the American Federation of Arts of Abstract
Expressionists. That was what it was called.
And there was a Pollock that had bottle caps
pushed into it and cigarette butts and bits of
broken glass. It was the most irreverent thing
I'd ever seen. I just couldn't-I went every day
to see this exhibition. It was not just Pollock,
but there was a DeKooning in it and a Gorky and
a Kline. And I thought-and I was then-I was taking
studio painting. And I was very interested in
painting, although I felt very limited. And I
tried to see as much as I could. When I saw DeKooning's
work, it actually lifted me off the ground. I
got I guess the nearest thing I'll ever have
to a religious experience. It was really a whole
sense of uplift. And so I then started seeking
out DeKooning's work whenever I could find it. And through college, I just kept going to more
and more exhibitions. So, it just continued.
It was a continuation-of course, when I got near
graduation time, my father said, "Well,
what do you want to do, Son?"
I said, "Gee, Dad, I'd like to go to architectural
school." "That's wonderful," he
said. "The only graduate school I'd pay
for is law school." [laughter] So, being
of firm character, I went to law school. [laughter]
[J. Stone] Now, Wayne, cartooning had a big influence
on you as well. You worked for Walt Disney.
And I understand when you were in the Army,
you drew caricatures and cartoons on airplanes.
[Thiebaud] I think a lot of critics still think
I'm just painting cartoons. [laughter] They may
not realize that that's a compliment to me, that
I love cartoonists, and I love cartoons. We collect
original cartoons. And I think they're in many
ways undercelebrated as some of the great graphic
artists of our century. But the other thing that
you don't hear about Allan is that he has an
art name [laughter] called Abraham Stein. And
he-I know someday he's going to do his own one
man exhibition, because he's actually a very
good painter. And a lot of people don't know
that.
[A. Stone] Abraham Stein is a name that I wrote
under, remember? [laughter]
[Thiebaud] That's the best review I ever had.
[laughter]
[A. Stone] In the early days, when we were having
trouble getting reviews, I wrote a review of
Wayne's show under the name of Abraham Stein,
and it got published. [laughter]
[Thiebaud] Well, that will be all over tonight.
[laughter]
[J. Stone] You two are similar in that you both
derive such joy from being in the studio-the
immersion and the process of making art. Allan,
as a witness, and Wayne as a participant. How
much time do you spend in the studio now, Wayne?
Can you describe a day for us?
[Thiebaud] It's pretty consistently early morning
and then-
[J. Stone] How early is early for you?
[Thiebaud] Well, it varies, but I prefer to get
up fairly early and work until about 10 o'clock.
That's when I go and try to play tennis. If I
can get four hours in the morning-
[J. Stone] So, you're in your studio at 6 o'clock.
[Thiebaud] Yeah. And then come back and work
in the afternoon. And I have a terrific indulgent
family that lets me paint on Christmas afternoons
or Thanksgiving. And that's-I'm really blessed
with that, because they'll put up with the greatest
nonsense in the world. I'll say, "I'm sorry.
I have to go paint." And they-they indulge
me in that. But I-it's sort of a steady painting
process. Since I didn't have a chance ever to
go to art school, I just realized the way you
get work done is to start and keep doing and
doing it. And you-by that process, of course,
you do 12 paintings, and you're lucky if you
get one or none. But the process is usually pretty
boring and day by day, hour by hour over a long
period of time. I should be able to give you
some good answer, but I don't have any. [laughter]
[J. Stone] The scale of your new paintings-the
large landscapes that were in your traveling
retrospective-is quite impressive. How do you-do
you lay them on the floor? Do you actually have
step stools or ladders in your studio?
[Thiebaud] The larger paintings?
[J. Stone] Yes, the really monumental ones.
[Thiebaud] Yeah, a large painting for me is
probably 6 feet, 5 feet. And I can still reach
that pretty much. [laughter] So, I don't paint
on the floor. Most of them are upright. I work
pretty directly.
[J. Stone] Maybe they were just hung high. [laughter]
[Thiebaud] It might help to put them on the
floor, and-
[J. Stone] Allan, you have often said that everything
you do is basically instinctive or intuitive,
that art is about feelings and trusting your
feelings. How do you balance the intellectual
and aesthetic pursuit of the art business with
the economic realities?
[A. Stone] Let's say that up until the time
I went into the art gallery, I was practicing
law, and I was being very logical. And I felt
like a duck out of water. I could arrive at answers
intuitively that I would then have to reconstruct
going backwards to buoy up in terms of the logic.
But then when I went into the art field, I could-you
know, I could feel things. And I trusted my feelings,
and I still so. That's the only thing I ever
trust. Don't trust words. Don't trust-just reactions.
And it's not just seeing, because it's really
what you perceive. There are any number of levels
of communication going on between two people
when they talk. There's-on one level, you're
having a conversation, but you're sizing each
other up. There are all kinds of other levels
of communication. I think the same thing is true
with paintings. I mean, there's on the one hand,
the relationship if it's a literary painting,
a storytelling picture, but that picture is also
reaching out to you in other ways in terms of
its-the power of its color. So, you're in an
area that's really decidedly nonverbal and very
intuitive, instinctual. And so I-and I feel very
comfortable in that area. That's the way I've
run my life, really. I trust it, and I go with it.
[J. Stone] How about you, Wayne?
[Thiebaud] Well, I think the word "intuitive" is
a fascinating word, because it's another one
of those terms that we all use. And to try and
figure out somewhat precisely what it is-particularly
in teaching, because the students will often-you'll
ask them why they did something, and they'll
say, "Well, I just did it intuitively." But
if you look beyond that and try to figure out
in order to help the student to examine more
closely perhaps what factors led into that, I
usually tell them about something like tennis
or golf where you go to a pro, and he tells you, "Now,
logically, this is the way you hit the ball.
You make sure you get your arm back far enough.
You be sure you go-when the racquet comes to
the ball, it wants to be at a certain level,
and be sure that when you go through the ball,
that you keep on going through the ball." You're
thinking of all these things. And the pro hits
the ball to you and you-the ball comes, and you
figure out, "Let's see. I have to get the
racquet back, and I have to then"--[laughter]
and of course, then you don't hit the ball. So,
he puts you through this process where you go-oh,
you hit a whole basket-a basket of balls over
and over and over again. And finally one time
you swing your arm through it, and "How
did I learn that? How did I get there?" And
in painting, there's some things like that where
if students pay too much attention to the hope
that intuition alone may help them, that can
be dangerous, because then they think they don't
have to go back and go to the building blocks
or very basic things about what it takes to build
a painting with some degree of authenticity or
some sense of rightness. So, it's a fascinating
question, and it's argued endlessly as people
know-the argument, for instance, "Was Cezanne
an intuitive or an intellectual painter?" "Well,
no one knows, and it doesn't finally matter,
but it's a fascinating question. [pause] Did
I stop the whole thing? [laughter]
[J. Stone] No, that's good.
[Thiebaud] You have to be careful with these
damn professors. They talk more and more about
less and less all the time. [laughter]
[J. Stone] Wayne, was there a moment when you
felt like you had arrived as an artist?
[Thiebaud] Arrived?
[J. Stone] Arrived. [laughter]
[Thiebaud] No. I don't even use the word "artist."
[J. Stone] I know. You consider yourself a painter.
What is the distinction for you between being
called a painter and being called an artist?
[Thiebaud] Oh, monumental. Endless. You can't
make art on purpose. It would be wonderful if
you could. My students are always saying-I say, "Where
are you going?" "Oh, I'm going to go
do my art." "Not so fast. That's not
gonna happen. [laughter] Someone else is gonna
decide whether you're doing art or not. You mean,
you're going to do a painting?" But I think
it's also a really terrific help to make a distinction
between art and something like painting. Art
is something I really-frankly, I don't know what
art is. I think it's one of the dirtiest words
in the English language. [laughter] Everything's
art or can be art or might be art or should be
art. And it also-when you think of it, it's essentially
a discourse. When we talk about art, that's a
new idea essentially in terms of our civilization.
Most of the world's art was done-what we think
of as art not being thought of as art at all
as you know. But art is also very, very abstract
as an idea. You can't touch it. You can't find
it. Art is also always changing, which is terrific,
because that's what the importance of art is.
It's made to surprise us, to make us different
than we are. And we all hope-I mean, that's a
great hopeful notion. But painting, by comparison,
is just an old flat piece of something with some
stuff smeared on it. And it doesn't move, it
doesn't talk. It doesn't do anything unless we
do something to it. Unless we get at it with
our bodies, and feel it with the same responses
that the painter had. That's what they want you
to do. That's why when you-the wonderful thing-I just love going to museums, and to try and be
intimately connected and do the painting with
them. I mean, I could never do the painting with
them, but I like to think that I'm in that world
suddenly in terms of my physical presence. And
that's how you bring a painting alive. Otherwise,
people are right when they say painting is dead.
But you have to bring it up like Lazarus, you
know.
[J. Stone] Allan, was there a moment when you
felt like you had arrived as a dealer?
[A. Stone] I'm still waiting. [laughter] I don't
know what that really means, okay. I thought
at one point that if there weren't 50 million
people chasing me for money, that you'd reach
a certain level, but that's not it either. [laughter]
I don't know. I think it has to do with some
sense of internal satisfaction about your life.
I mean, I think-you know, I mean, I'm not really
ready to sum up yet, but in terms of your relationship
to your family, your kids, your public, the people
you deal with professionally, if you're comfortable
in your own skin, acting in all these different
arenas, I think that might be considered having
arrived. But that has to do with a kind of internal
sense of accomplishment.
[Thiebaud] In some way, it's a sort of dangerous
idea, isn't it? The idea of arriving or being
famous or-I mean, someone said it very well when
they said it's-like our attraction to celebrity
and names and so on. That in some ways when we
do that, aren't we sort of surrendering ourself
in a sense to this thing out there?
[A. Stone] The pursuit of excellence. You don't
want to ever yield to that. You want to continue
that, continue the chase. And in a sense, it's
a lifetime pursuit. It's never a pursuit where
you stop. You don't put down the tools and say, "That's
it. I don't want to play any more." That's
something I would never even think about.
[J. Stone] Wayne spoke about the transformative
power of paintings-of going to museums and looking
at paintings and really jumping into the paintings
and feeling what he imagines the artist felt
when he painted the painting. Do you ever have
those feelings, Allan?
[A. Stone] Basically, art converts the heathen,
you know? And I think art has a kind of power-high
art, maybe low art-but it has a kind of power,
which can change and shape. And in terms of my
own experience, all I know is that I like the
feelings I get when I see certain paintings.
I mean, I'll go to the Met to the Robert Lehmann
collection to look at a Balthus painting, and
I never get tired-every time, I see that painting,
I just get-you know? I can't even figure out
why that is, you know, or what there is about
that. I can start to try and analyze it intellectually,
but it's something that is ineffable. That experience.
So, in terms of the power of art, yeah, I think
it has a lot of power. At least in terms of my
own feeling about it. I have a certain reverence
for it that I don't have for most things. I mean,
I'm really an iconoclast. But I think art is
really where the temple is.
[J. Stone] Wayne, your subject matter has changed
over the years. And the familiar food themes
have been revisited. How do you know when you've
discovered the subject of your next painting?
What feelings do you have around that discovery?
[Thiebaud] I think mostly I set problems. And
problems come out of the long tradition of something
like painting. I mean, they're just-as Allan
indicated, those are heroes of mine. In some
ways, it's audacious to pick up a brush when
you have been to museums and seen what Rembrandt
or Velasquez or Vermeer might do. But there's
some compelling aspect that lets you become more
closely and more intimately connected to other
paintings by painting, by drawing, by painting-or
by looking a lot. So, the problems are often
set having to do with color or having to do with
space or light. And to pick subject matters that
somehow allow those problems to be worked on,
to be-try to figure them out. Try to do with
them. I'd like also just to say that-about going
to museums. I think those museums represent a
kind of exotic wonderland of the best things
we've done. And we keep them for that reason.
They're touchstones of-if we have a Bureau of
Standards, that's probably what the museum represents
for us, our finest things. The other thing is
that some of those things we wouldn't have been
able to see the world in the way in which we
are able to see it. In other words, there's such
a thing as a Van Gogh world. And where did that come from? Meaning you can trace his developments,
his influences. And then at a final point, you
say, "No, that's a-there's a-it's a different
visual species. It's a different world." And
we wouldn't have those worlds without people
who took the trouble to make these various worlds.
And what those worlds do for us-for me anyway-is
to enlarge the time I have on earth to expand
time, expand feelings about things, and what
the visual enterprise can be. And you test that
also by relooking-as Allan says, going back to
that Balthus. I feel like that indeed. There's
a very wonderful book that's coming out by Wendy
Lesser who publishes a literary magazine called
Three Penny Something--[laughter]-Three Penny
Review, I guess. She's writing a book called-on
rereading. In other words, what she read as early
in her life and then to go back and read something
like Don Quixote after you-it's been 30 years
since you've done it. And the same thing is true
with painting. I mean, when I go to see a painting,
at first, it might have been, "Gee, I love
that-I love what's happening with the story.
I love what's happening with the paint. I love-and
I see it in a certain way." And 30 years
later, I might go and-when I was wondering what
was happening in the painting then, I have to
wonder what's happened to me, you know. How did
I change? Why couldn't I have seen that earlier?
And of course, that scares the hell out of you,
because you do that at your own paintings. [laughter]
Why can't I see those mistakes I made 20 years
ago like I can see them today? It's terrible.
[laughter]
[J. Stone] Wayne, how do you know when you have
finished a painting?
[Thiebaud] I don't. [laughter] The interesting
painter-as some of you know, Robert Kulicke came
out to do a visiting teaching at Davis where
I teach, and he lived with us for a while. And
he would say, "Well, let's-we're going to
work together. We're going to pastel together." So,
he would take the kitchen chair and put his shoes
on it so it wouldn't slide. That was his easel.
And he'd put up a little piece of what he called
matte middles, and set up his pastel. And I would-he
would fix one for me. So, he would work, and
he was working on a nice beautiful little painting
of a pear. A pear was sitting there, and he was
painting away. And so I started mine, and I was
working also. And finally he sort of looked around
and started giggling. Finally he says, "Oh,
that's it" and stood up. [laughter] And
I looked over and he looked over at mine and
he said, "That's great." I said, "I
have just started." [laughter] He said, "That's
the trouble with you." He said, "Every
artist should have someone with a hammer in back
of them. When you're up to a certain point like
that, hit him on the head so they know to stop." [laughter]
That might be the only way you know you're finished.
But it's a hard thing to know that, I think.
[A. Stone] Some of our most important and leading
artists had the problem of not really knowing
when a painting was over and when he might be
working into a new painting. Mr. DeKooning had
that problem. If it weren't for Elaine who would
pull him off the painting and say, "That's
finished, stop," I mean, he was perfectly
capable of painting another painting on top of
an already finished painting. [laughter] I mean,
because emotionally he was never finished painting,
you see. So, sometimes, you need a governor or
somebody who says, "Enough."
[Thiebaud] Writers have editors, don't they?
Is that part of the reason for dealers? [laughter]
[J. Stone] Allan, can you describe what it's
been like for you to visit Wayne's studio over
the years?
[A. Stone] Well, it's always been joyful. It's
always been exciting. You see, I basically am
very jealous of him, the truth be known, because
I would really like to be him. [laughter]
[Thiebaud] And I'd like to be him on the tennis
court! [laughter]
[A. Stone] So, you know, when I go there, and
I look at these-some of these nuances, and the
way he's treated-you know, when you look at something,
say, across the room, and you move up close to
it, and you see that it's composed of many different
colors that suddenly it's much more complicated
than it seems. How the hell do you do that? How
do you create that richness up close? You get
away, and have it all lock in and become-I just-I
just-it's magic. It really is. And so I-you know,
I am-I'm reverential, I would say, okay?
[Thiebaud] That's why he's the only dealer I've
ever had. [laughter]
[J. Stone] Is it like going through a candy
store? Do you just want them all?
[A. Stone] It's not just that. It's a question
of just the amazement of how things are done,
and how things-as simple as a little chalk or
pastel and basically what you can create. And
it's the magic of birth, which-I mean, art is
magical. It's the ability really-or you separate,
say, art from painting-I mean, art is really
the ability to create magic, you know? Or someone
else would-another one of my favorite definitions
of art would be reaching for the angels. Man
reaching above himself for the angels. He doesn't
always succeed, but if you can create magic once
in a while, you're way ahead of the game, you
know? So, I think that for me is just awesome.
And I just-I also love his pastel work and his
use of color, which is just incredible, I think.
All that stuff.
[J. Stone] All that stuff. Wayne, if you were
to write a book, what would the chapter titles
be? [laughter]
[Thiebaud] Well, let's see. One would be "Space." One
would be "Blue." One would be "Orange." [laughter]
One would be "Light." I wouldn't use
terms like "expression" or "creativity." Those
would be cancelled out. [laughter] No, I think
it's-there are some-now I think wonderful books
written about painting. And I'm not a writer,
so I wouldn't presuppose to write about it. But
I love reading about it, and I love what other
people read and say. It's even quite wonderful
to read critics, because they'll tell you what
you're doing. [laughter] Actually it can be quite
rewarding and helpful, and you learn things.
I have a sort of interest in that. I also read
a lot of poetry and read poetry to my students,
because I think there's also a wonderful correlation.
Someone once said that poetry represents a kind
of x-ray of literature. And painting I think
is a kind of x-ray of the visual world. It looks
under, around, through, develops different species,
different configurations. So, it's a quite wonderful
thing to read also about particularly art history
and that philosophy of art. We lost a really
wonderful, I thought, writer in our-in Ernest-Sir
Ernest Gombreth, who has passed away. And his
book, Art and Illusion, I think clarified a lot
of things. So, I think books are important. I
think there are difficulties with drawing books.
While there are some very good ones, the biggest
mistake anyone makes-like for instance, if I
were to do a book on drawing, I'd be very sure
not to do what other people who've written books
on drawing, and that is reproduce their own drawing.
[laughter] Students can then say, "If I
have to draw like that, I'm not going to read
this book." [laughter]
[J. Stone] Allan, if you were to write a book,
what would your chapter titles be?
[A. Stone] Jer, why don't you just ask what
my favorite color is? [laughter]
[Thiebaud] What is it? [laughter]
[A. Stone] Well, it used to be orange, and now
it's purple. [laughter] No, look, I'm having
to deal with part of that issue now. And I don't
think I have the inclination or the patience
to delve back into my life and write a book about
my experiences in the art world. I just-I don't
like digging up the past. I'd rather go forward,
you know. And so I-that's a question which really-I
don't even like reading. [laughter] You know,
I hate it. I mean, really, it's something you
do when you want to go to sleep.
[J. Stone] I know you'd rather go to a movie.
[A. Stone] But even the movies are terrible.
[laughter] So, you read to go to sleep. And now
I go to movies to go to sleep. [laughter] So
much for my book. [laughter]
[J. Stone] Well, I have a question that's for
both of you. Allan, you've been quoted as saying
that art has become so popular that it's almost
becoming a spectator sport. And because of the
associated glamour and social acceptance now,
you have many more people who want to become
artists, that art schools are turning out a proliferation
of people who are theoretically artists, but
are basically by and large more prepared to appreciate
it than to practice it. Wayne, is that bad? And
do you have an insight for us on that observation?
[Thiebaud] Gee, I don't know. [laughter] I guess
if I were to try to say something about the present
situation in that sense, it might be a kind of
warning and something to be careful about, and
that's the idea of the term "excitement." And
I think the art world has gotten, I think, into
that with disastrous results for me. I think
excitement's great if you go to football games.
It's terrific to be excited about love, excited
about all kinds of things. But in learning, in
any kind of reflective appreciation of something,
one has to be absorbed, I think. And to be absorbed,
you can't really be excited, because that's another
state. And you go to a museum and the people
who I like to see in museums are the ones who
sit down someplace and look and keep looking.
And you cannot look enough, long enough, carefully
enough to see paintings in my judgement. And
it isn't exciting in that sense, I don't think.
And that I think has been the wrong turn to-and
you hear often, "This is an exciting new
painter. This is an exciting new sculpture. This
is an exciting new conceptual artist." And
I don't find very much excitement in those in
the first place, but I'm looking for some sort
of work in whatever category to have some sort
of meditative character, some richness of visual
experience that transcends ordinariness, and
really does take up something really quite special.
And that's enough said.
[J. Stone] It's quite different now from the
art world of 1961. or is it the same?
[A. Stone] You talking to me?
[J. Stone] Both of you.
[A. Stone] You talking to me? [laughter] Look,
the art world in the early-in the beginning for
me was very exciting, because it was new, and
I was so-I was in a constant state of excitation.
Excitation. [laughter] But it wasn't much of
a business world, but it was a world where people
would argue with passion about ideas. It was
a world where there was a lot of mutual respect,
relatively. And I think what's happened in the
art world in brief is that it's been sort of
corrupted by success and by money, which has
increased everybody's expectations and has made
it for me a less interesting world than it used
to be. It's not that you don't want to be able
to pay your bills and things like that. But the
issue today-and I think the issues of money have
polluted every aspect of our society. It's ruining
athletics. A baseball player will sit out a season,
because he's only getting 13 million instead
of 15 million for the season. It's just-in every
aspect in our society, money is doing us in with
the kind of preoccupation with money. And I think
it's certainly not been a healthy thing for the
art world. So, in that sense, it's been that
kind of a change where the art world is much
more bottom line now. Much more business oriented. And before it was-I don't know. It was almost
more-I don't even know how to describe it. It
was definitely a learning experience every day.
[J. Stone] What do you think, Wayne?
[Thiebaud] What do I think?
[J. Stone] About the difference in the art world
from 1961 to the present for you as a painter.
[Thiebaud] I agree with him. [laughter] I could
tell a joke though.
[J. Stone] Yes, please. [laughter]
[Thiebaud] Well, maybe I'd better not tell it.
[laughter] The only one I've heard is-I hope
you won't take it wrong, but it's about an old
farmer who had three daughters. How does that
sound for a starter? [laughter] And he's very-they're
very precious to him, and he's-they're very beautiful.
And he knows how the world is. So he says, "I
know what can happen to these daughters of mine." He
lives way out in the country. He says, "They've
all got dates tonight. So, I'm going to sit on
a chair in the front room with my rifle, my shotgun.
Any false move out of these guys, if they don't
come up and offer the right kind of approach,
I'm-that's the end of them." So, he's sitting
and the doorbell rings, and the first fella comes
in. "Hi, my name is Freddy. I've come for
Betty. We're going out for spaghetti. [laughter]
I think she's ready." Well, the old guy,
the farmer, says, "That guy's got some imagination.
[laughter] He's all right." So, then the
doorbell rings again. "Hi, my name is Joe.
I've come for Flo. We're going to the show. Do
you think she's ready to go?" [laughter]
That's good. He's very happy. A few minutes later,
the doorbell rings. "Hi, my name is Chuck"-bang!
[laughter]
[A. Stone] That about sums it up.
[J. Stone] Yes, I think so. [laughter] I think
we're going to open up-we're going to open up
the floor to the audience. If you have any questions
for Allan and Wayne, please step up to the microphone,
and jump on in.
[Thiebaud] People are running for the exits.
[A. Stone] They're running for the doors. [laughter]
If the art world has been polluted by money,
what do you see as the savior, the solution?
[A. Stone] Well, I'm not sure that there is
a solution, because it's not just the art world.
It's the whole of our society. It's like corrosion
of all our institutions. It's politics. It's
so much-the way this country runs in terms of
the influence of some of the bigger corporations
on government. I mean, if you really get into
it, that could be another evening. But it's something-it's
sort of-it's not just one segment of our society.
It's sort of a general issue. It may be part
of the maturation of our whole culture, and I'm
not sure what can be done about it. I just may
be observing a condition that exists.
[Thiebaud] On somewhat of a positive note [laughter],
it should be noted that there are an awful lot
of people, young and old, who still paint, hoping
for the best, but they're prepared for the worst.
And they do it, because they love it, and it's
important to them, and it makes a life so that
they're-and it's working with students again.
They find ways to do it if they love doing it,
and the expectancy factor I think can be downplayed
with some sort of sensible life thought. For
instance, when they'll talk about, "Well,
how-how do you think I can go about this?" I
say, "Well, you'd better find a way, if
you're really going to be a painter, find a way
to sort of-don't worry so much about making a
living as such by your painting, but make a life
with your painting, and find some way to do that,
because it's-that's probably the way it's going
to be." And very, very few people still
who are painters can really exist by their work
alone. But that doesn't keep them from doing
it. No, they're-and that to me is probably more
hopeful than anything. And every place you go-every
place I'm asked to go, they're always a terrific
group of young people working and loving it and
making a life. And this I think is a very positive
aspect.
Sydney Goldstein: Mr. Stone, I'm fascinated
by the ingenuity that it took for you to write
a review at some point under a pseudonym of someone
you represented, I guess.
[A. Stone] I also write under my own name. [laughter]
Sydney Goldstein: I would love to hear of the
circumstances of your writing a review of Wayne
Thiebaud's work and who you published it with,
and more of that story.
[A. Stone] Well, I felt Wayne wasn't getting
enough attention. Maybe we weren't getting reviews,
although we did get-
Sydney Goldstein: When was it?
[A. Stone] Way back in the beginning.
Sydney Goldstein: What's the beginning?
[A. Stone] '61, '62.
Sydney Goldstein: I wasn't born.
[A. Stone] Don't say that. [laughter] I was
playing tennis with somebody yesterday. And he
was born the year I graduated from Harvard. I
said, "My God, I can't believe that."
[Thiebaud] I have students who ask me, "Are
you still alive?" [laughter]
[A. Stone] But it was an act of desperation.
Sydney Goldstein: What was the name of the publication?
[A. Stone] It was one of the art newspapers,
one of these small newspapers that has come and
gone, but there were a number of-Art Speak, I
think, around the city.
Sydney Goldstein: in San Francisco?
[A. Stone] No, New York. The reviews that we
got here when we first had the show-the first
show that we had of Wayne's, and it was successful
were something like, "Gee, how come this
guy is doing so well who we don't think so much
of." Do you remember those?
[Thiebaud] And they're still saying it. [laughter]
Charles Campbell: May I ask a question next?
[A. Stone] Yes, sir.
Charles Campbell: A number of years ago, Wayne,
you were to retire from teaching at UC Davis,
and you chose to stay on in your option. As I
remember, you were asked if you wanted to teach
postgraduate art students or young ones, and
you chose the beginners, to teach them. Why?
And question 2, not question, but when you were
teaching at Sac State, with your early career
in teaching, you had a young art student, and
there was an episode where he would not permit
you to look at his work until the last day. Without
revealing names, would you tell us what happened?
Which you well remember.
[Thiebaud] [laughter] Well, I teach beginners,
because I think it's always a beginning. I don't-I
just think that's where everything essentially
is. So, I don't-we all work with the graduates,
but I'm very reluctant about it. The incident
that Charles Campbell refers to is a painter
who-a young painter who was painting. He came
in the painting class, and the way I happened
to teach is to go around and talk to all of them,
and give some sort of-try to figure out how to
help them, if I can, and how they might help
themselves. And this young painter said-came
up to me and said, "I'm taking your class,
Thiebaud, but [laughter] I don't-I rather you
didn't talk about my work. I don't want any criticism
of my work." "That's fine. That's a
right you have." So, as I came around, this
painter was painting what I would describe as
one of the ugliest paintings I'd ever seen. He
had a hand coming out of a sort of Daliesque
receding landscape, cracked earth, holding an
egg that was cracking, and a sort of awful looking
nude woman was emerging out of this egg. And
it was all painted in what I would describe as
manure green. [laughter] I thought, "Boy,
am I glad I don't have to talk about that one." Well,
I continued the circle and I talked to people.
And as I came around a little bit later on, he
came over and said, "I guess I've changed
my mind. I guess I'll have you talk about my
painting anyway." I thought, "Oh, God." [laughter]
So, I warned him. I said, "Well, you know,
when I talk about these things, I'm very direct,
and I tell you what I think is really wrong with
it" and so on and so on. "No," he
says. "I'm ready for that," he said.
So, I started talking, and talked about several
aspects and so on, and what he might do. I could
see him sort of tightening up his lips. [laughter]
And I talked on for maybe 10 or 15 minutes. And
finally I said, "Okay. Is that enough?" He
goes, "Yeah, that's enough." [laughter]
And he-this is a sad story. He walked outside
the junior college where I was teaching and fell
off the steps and broke his leg, and he never
forgave me for that. [laughter] But now he's
a well known painter. [laughter] You're dying
to know who it is, but I'm not going to tell
you. [laughter]
Charles Campbell: I talked to that artist. I
discussed it with him. He admits every bit of
it, and he didn't mind revealing-his name is
Mel Ramos. It happened. [laughter]
[Thiebaud] And he's still painting women coming
out of things. [laughter]
Alan Stein: This is a question for Wayne, but
it involves Allan. I'm familiar with several
other artists that Allan has had long relationships
with. And my impression is that they move from
representational to more abstract. And I was
wondering whether you ever were doing any purely
abstract, or whether Allan encouraged you in
that direction.
[Thiebaud] No, Allan-blessed, he lets me do
whatever mistakes I want to make. He doesn't-he's
been ideal in terms of letting me do what I can
do. About abstraction-yes, I love abstract, nonobjective
painting, and I've done a whole host of them,
and I have students who do them all the time.
I think that's a way of learning about the structure
of composition. I recently finally did-I don't
show them, but I finally showed them to my family.
And spread out about 40 or 50 of them, and happily
they've been destroyed. [laughter] But I learned
a great deal from them. I mean, it's one of those
other aspects of part of the process. And I admire
very much abstract painting.
[J. Stone] Any more questions? Please come up
and stand at the microphone so everybody can
hear you. Do you think artists today make more
of a social political comment than they did in
the 60s? Or is it the same?
[Thiebaud] Allan?
[A. Stone] Look, basically, I have never been
very enthusiastic about what I would call-almost
sort of propaganda art or art that has a very
heavy message in political or social direction.
I think a really mature work of art should combine
a lot of different aspects of things-some of
those things being woven into it, but never-it's
almost like cooking and using seasoning in cooking.
The proper use of seasoning is with a light hand
so that it enhances the condition of the whole,
rather than standing out on its own and being
too pronounced. And there's a lot of what I would
call political art and social commentary going
on today which I find a total bore. I'm sorry.
I just feel that way about it. I'm much more
interested in things that I would say are universal.
Or I look for the universal even in statements
about the specific. Yes?
[Thiebaud] There is a lot of what she referred
to-in answer to her question. A lot of interest
in that particular genre.
This is for Allan. I was just wondering-picking
up on something you said earlier-do you now treat
your business with the idea of the bottom line?
Or do you still try to maintain that sort of
integrity-
[A. Stone] I mean we never have. I've shown
people for years we don't sell, because I like
their work, and I think it's deserving of being
shown. There aren't a lot of places that will
do that. You know, if you don't-in the real fast
track of the art world, if you're not selling
your pictures, you're going to have to find other
representation. I try to run my business from
what I would call the high ground.
[Thiebaud] And that's why he's often referred
to as a nondealer. [laughter] Someone told me-when
they asked me, "Who's your dealer?" I
said, "Allan Stone." "Oh, he's
a nondealer." [laughter]
[A. Stone] I have been criticized a lot by even
some artists who used to be with me. This guy
was one of the most aggressive, thinking every
angle-he was definitely not-he should have been
running a gallery. He said, "Look, I don't
want a poet for a dealer. [laughter] I don't
want a philosopher for a dealer. I want you to
be a whore. [laughter] I want you to go out and
sell yourself for me. I want you to go out"-I
said, "You definitely have the wrong gallery." [laughter]
[J. Stone] I want to thank Wayne and Allan for
coming and being a part of this benefit. And
I want to encourage everybody-there are signed
autographed catalogues from Wayne's recent retrospective
for sale at the front desk to benefit this artist
grant fund and nonprofit gallery fund at the
front desk. And I hope that everyone will-if
they don't already have one-pick up an autographed
catalog from Wayne's retrospective. It's really
a fabulous catalog. And there are also two really
beautiful prints that are also available that
are both donated. 100% of the proceeds is going
to go to the SFADA grant.
[Thiebaud] I would like to thank Jeremy Stone
for her helping us out. [applause]
[A. Stone] Good job, Jer.
[Thiebaud] You were terrific.
[A. Stone] Okay. Now unplug us. [laughter]
[J. Stone] Thank you all for coming. [applause]
© 2002 Jeremy Stone, San Francisco,
CA
|